I sometimes see things like or
instead of the usual
. Where do these strange notations come from? Suppose we have a random variable
, considered as a function which maps events from a
-field to an interval on the real line. Let the random variable take values in the range
, which we will partition into
subintervals
, with
,
,
,
, and with
,
. The random variable
maps each event
in the
-field to a corresponding interval
on the real line according to a probability distribution. Pick an arbitrary point
in each subinterval
. Form a simple random variable
from
by assigning to each
the value
. Then the expectation of
is given by
But if we denote the probability distribution function of by
, we have
Therefore we can write
Therefore the notation means: the weighted sum of the t values, where the weights are the probabilities given by the difference in the values of the probability distribution function at the endpoints of the interval corresponding to t. But the approximations improve as the subdivisions become finer, so we can suppose
to be given by
So the notation means: the weighted sum of the t values, where the weights are the probabilities given by the difference in the values of the probability distribution function at the endpoints of the differential interval
.
In the case of absolutely continuous random variables, we have a density function , so
where denotes the
-th interval length for
over which
can be regarded as being approximately constant. This implies
As the subdivisions become finer, both of the above approximations improve. On the basis of this informal argument, we should then have
Therefore we have two equivalent notations in the absolutely continuous case:
