I was struggling to explain the concept of a solid angle to a student. I found that the following approach, by analogy with plane angles, succeeded.

In the case of a plane angle (in radians) subtended by an arc length
, the following relationship holds:
On the left-hand side we have the ratio of to the circumference of a unit circle,
. On the right-hand side, we have the ratio of the arc length
to the circumference of a circle of radius
,
. So, the idea is that
is a measure of the part of the circumference of the unit circle at the apex that is covered by the projection of
on to this unit circle. From (1) we get
(or the familiar formula for calculating arc lengths, ).
A solid angle is simply a 3D analogue of this.

Instead of a unit circle at the apex, we have a unit sphere with surface area . The solid angle
(in steradians) is subtended by the area element
, and these satisfy the following relationship:
On the left-hand side we have the ratio of to the surface area of the unit sphere,
. On the right-hand side, we have the ratio of the area element
to the surface area of a sphere of radius
,
. So, the idea is that
is a measure of the part of the surface area of the unit sphere at the apex that is covered by the projection of
on to this unit sphere. From (3), we get the familiar formula for solid angles,
It is possible to solve some simple problems involving solid angles purely by symmetry considerations. For example, to work out the solid angle subtended by one of the faces of a cube, we note that the cube has six faces of equal area and together they must account for the entire surface area of the unit sphere at the apex. Therefore, a single cube face must account for one-sixth of the surface area of the unit sphere at the apex, so we have
Therefore, a single cube face subtends a solid angle of steradians.
